<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Connected Data - Latest Comments in Google holds a gun to Apple&amp;#8217;s head</title><link>http://connecteddata.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://connecteddata.disqus.com/google_holds_a_gun_to_apple8217s_head/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 03:13:13 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Google holds a gun to Apple&amp;#8217;s head</title><link>http://blog.cosential.com/?p=104#comment-4285125</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for this article about "Google holds a gun to Apple’s head"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BusbyTest</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 03:13:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google holds a gun to Apple&amp;#8217;s head</title><link>http://blog.cosential.com/?p=104#comment-4032094</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Meh. According to Ars Technica's Erica Sadun, the App Store is littered with apps calling unpublished APIs.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phil</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 19:10:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google holds a gun to Apple&amp;#8217;s head</title><link>http://blog.cosential.com/?p=104#comment-4027062</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Google admits to it. Google admits breaking App Store rules. It seems that Google did have a gun pointed at Apple's head. &lt;a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-10108348-37.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-10108348-37.html"&gt;http://news.cnet.com/8301-1...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Cornish</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 13:17:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google holds a gun to Apple&amp;#8217;s head</title><link>http://blog.cosential.com/?p=104#comment-3937491</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm not quite sure why there is so much concern here.&lt;br&gt;Clearly both Apple and Google have partnered in various areas to their mutual benefit, and as with most business partnerships, there is certainly going to be certain information shared between them as well as cooperation and favoritism.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I see nothing out of the ordinary going on here.  I also suspect that Apple might give special treatment to any application where it provides extraordinary value (as determined by Apple) to the platform and their customers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Walter</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:05:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google holds a gun to Apple&amp;#8217;s head</title><link>http://blog.cosential.com/?p=104#comment-3918295</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Producing a short video teaser is a hallowed tradition. About as hallowed as strong-arming a distributor into carrying your product. I don't see a reason to cry foul here.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But the point in Gruber's post is that there exist some really nifty features on the iPhone that are only accessible via Apple's private APIs.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ouroboros</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:21:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google holds a gun to Apple&amp;#8217;s head</title><link>http://blog.cosential.com/?p=104#comment-3917885</link><description>&lt;p&gt;conspiracy theories are rarely worth the time to read.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bob</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:00:13 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>